Note: This post announces a Czech-language reference work intended for qualified specialists. It does not provide instructions for misuse — only a structured framework for identifying, preventing, and intervening in systematic epistemic damage. The work is published as part of the Prismatic Platform’s epistemic-security stack.
We’ve started shipping the first sections of the Kompendium epistemické a kognitivní anihilace — a Czech-language taxonomic system for phenomena that destroy the capacity to know. The kompendium has lived as private notes for a long time. Now it gets a permanent home at /kompendium/, wired into the platform’s glossary and integrated with the {{ cross_link(path=”/hub/dd/decisions/“, text=”Decision Engine”) }} calibration logic.
This post explains what it is, why it exists, and how we’re shipping it incrementally.
#What the kompendium is
A taxonomy. Specifically, a structured taxonomy of techniques and processes that systematically destroy a subject’s capacity to acquire, evaluate, integrate, and revise information.
It’s not a self-help book. It’s not a manifesto. It’s a reference work in the same lineage as forensic taxonomies, threat catalogs in cybersecurity, or differential-diagnosis manuals in clinical medicine — except that the threat surface is the human cognitive apparatus and the failure modes are at the epistemic rather than algorithmic level.
The structure is hierarchical. Eight primary sections, ranging from definitions and historical context through detailed technique inventories to clinical applications and theoretical reflections. Each technique gets a stable identifier in the form EA-X.Y.Z-α (for example, EA-1.1.1 is “Selektivní expozice” — Selective Exposure, the first technique in the first subcategory of the first primary category).
The notation matters because stability matters. URLs change. Titles get rewritten. But EA-1.1.1 will refer to the same phenomenon ten years from now. That stability lets the kompendium serve as a long-term cross-reference for clinical literature, forensic case work, and platform-level threat modeling.
#Why it exists
The honest answer: because nothing comparable exists in Czech, and most adjacent literature in English is either scattered across disciplines (Kahneman’s biases, Lifton’s thought reform, Fricker’s epistemic injustices, Pariser’s filter bubbles) or too narrowly focused on specific domains (cult psychology, propaganda studies, gaslighting in interpersonal contexts).
What’s missing is the integrative taxonomic layer — the cross-disciplinary classification scheme that lets a clinician, a journalist, a researcher, and a security analyst use the same vocabulary when they encounter different surface presentations of the same underlying mechanism.
A clinician treating a patient who has spent fifteen years in a cult community and a security analyst studying a state-sponsored disinformation operation are looking at instances of the same family of phenomena. The kompendium tries to make that family explicit.
The Czech-language emphasis is deliberate. There is no comparable structured Czech-language reference for these phenomena — and Czech academic discourse around epistemic manipulation tends to draw on translated English-language fragments rather than on a coherent native taxonomy. The kompendium fills that gap directly.
#What’s in it
The eight sections, in order:
- Předmluva — purpose, intended audience, ethical framework, methodology of use. Already shipped.
- Úvod do epistemické anihilace — definitions, historical context (from Sokrates through Lifton to filter bubbles), theoretical foundations, methodological notes. Already shipped.
- Základní kategorie epistemických manipulací — fundamental taxonomic units. The most important section for everyday use. Three chapters: academic intellectual manipulation techniques (13 techniques, the focus of our incremental publication), epistemic delegitimization scenarios, and advanced educational implementation. Already shipped, with per-technique deep-dives in progress.
- Terminální protokoly — complex sequences leading to systematic epistemic destruction. High-risk material. Currently in preparation; access will be tiered.
- Ultramární techniky fundamentální dekonstrukce — 150 techniques planned. Highest-risk material. Restricted-access publication only after IRB framework is finalized.
- Klinické aplikace a diagnostika — diagnostic indicators, therapeutic approaches, prevention strategies. In preparation.
- Teoretické a metakonceptuální reflexe — philosophical implications and interdisciplinary perspectives. In preparation.
- Přílohy — master technique index, anonymized case studies, training methodology, glossary cross-references. In preparation.
The first three sections are public from day one. The remaining five are gated by access tier and will be published incrementally as ethical review and editorial work complete.
#The eight glossary entries
The kompendium is supported by eight new glossary entries shipped today as part of the platform’s main glossary:
- Epistemická anihilace — the central concept
- Kognitivní anihilace — its cognitive sibling
- Taxonomie EA — the classification system itself
- Anankastický režim — terminal cognitive rigidity state
- Kognitivní anti-rekurzivita — failure of meta-cognitive recursion
- Epistemická alienace — alienation from one’s own cognition
- Ontologická anihilace — destruction of basic categories of being
- Metakognitivní destrukce — impairment of self-reflective capacity
These are written in English with Czech terminology preserved, since the glossary is the platform’s bilingual interface layer. The kompendium articles themselves are in Czech.
#Per-technique deep-dives
Beyond the section-level chapters, each documented technique gets a standalone deep-dive article at /kompendium/techniques/. These articles follow a uniform template:
- Identification — EA code, category, access level
- Definition — concise framing
- Operational mode — mechanism by which the technique works
- Phenomenological signs — what the subject experiences
- Detection markers — what an outside observer can recognize
- Risk contexts — where the technique typically appears
- Neutralization strategies — individual and institutional defenses
- Case studies — anonymized examples
- Relationship to other techniques — conjunctions, escalation chains, alternatives
- Reference into the kompendium — cross-link to the parent chapter
The first deep-dive — EA-1.1.1 Selektivní expozice — ships today as the template for the remaining twelve in Chapter 1, then for the rest of the taxonomy.
#How it integrates with the platform
The kompendium isn’t an isolated artifact. It connects to the rest of Prismatic in three concrete ways.
Decision Engine calibration. The {{ cross_link(path=”/hub/dd/decisions/“, text=”Decision Engine”) }} explicitly treats indicators of epistemic manipulation as negative confidence signals during calibration. When a source displays markers consistent with kompendium-classified manipulation patterns, its evidential weight is reduced, regardless of its formal credentials. This is technically minor — a few additional features in the calibration model — but conceptually significant: it means the kompendium directly affects how the platform reasons about source quality.
Color Team adversarial simulation. The Color Teams framework, particularly the Red Team adversarial simulation roles, draws scenarios from the kompendium taxonomy. When we test the platform’s resilience to epistemic adversarial inputs, we use the kompendium as the threat catalog.
NABLA Infinity defensive correspondences. The NABLA Infinity epistemic pipeline implements structural defenses corresponding to specific kompendium neutralization strategies. Source diversity checks correspond to defenses against EA-1.1.1 selective exposure. Explicit falsifiability tracking corresponds to defenses against EA-1.3.1 immunization. Provenance auditing corresponds to defenses against EA-1.3.3 thematic diversion.
This isn’t decoration. The kompendium shapes the architecture of the platform’s epistemic operations.
#What we’re not doing
A few things this announcement is not:
- It’s not a how-to. The kompendium describes mechanisms for the purpose of detection and intervention. It does not provide operational guidance for inducing epistemic damage. Sections that contain higher-risk material are gated and will be published only with adequate ethical oversight.
- It’s not a moral panic. The kompendium treats epistemic damage as a structural risk to be analyzed and mitigated, not as a sensational threat to be feared. The tone is forensic, not alarmist.
- It’s not finished. Two sections out of eight are public. Three more are in active drafting. Two more await ethical review. The kompendium will be incomplete for years. That’s intentional — taxonomies in this space should grow with the field, not freeze prematurely.
#Reading order
If you’re new to the material, the recommended order is:
- Start at the kompendium hub for orientation.
- Read 01 Předmluva — Účel kompendia for context, then Etické aspekty before going further.
- Move to 02 Úvod — Definice for foundational concepts. The historical context is optional but contextualizes the project significantly.
- Read 03.1 Akademické techniky for the taxonomic core.
- Browse techniques/ for per-technique deep-dives as they’re published.
If you’re a clinician encountering a specific case, jump directly to 03.1 and use the EA codes to locate relevant per-technique articles.
If you’re a researcher building on this work, 02.4 Metodologické poznámky is the entry point — it explicitly exposes our classification criteria, validation principles, and known limitations.
#What ships next
The next twelve per-technique articles complete Chapter 1 — the academic intellectual manipulation techniques (EA-1.1.2 through EA-1.5.2). After that, we begin Chapter 2 (delegitimization scenarios) and the diagnostic indicators in Section 06.
The roadmap is at the techniques index and updates with each new publication.
If you’re a qualified specialist who wants to contribute case studies, methodological refinements, or translation review, get in touch via the contact links at the bottom of any kompendium page.
#Connect & Contribute
Created by Tomáš Korcak (korczis) | Open Source under GHL
- GitHub | GitLab | LinkedIn | Contact
- Kompendium | Glossary | Philosophy | Developer Portal